By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. They're just different. FPS is important but a friend who owns both copy claimed otherwise which is why I posed the question. Blighttown is actually fun now because the frame rate isn't fucked anymore. I am currently playing demons souls … Question regarding the remastered version of the first dark souls, mainly for the purists and individuals that know the game like the back of their hands. They changed the enemy placements for the worse in the majority of areas, for the most part just making the game more cheesy. Thanks for your thoughts dude. Get scotfs and ds remastered? I see, so scholar of the first sin is definitive and you don’t know how much souls 1 remastered adds to the game. I have both versions of ds2, and agape ring was in the original as well. We’ll skip the graphical section for now, and put it at the bottom, because this is not fresh news, and odds are you’ve heard it already. It has been developed by QLOC (PS4, Xbox One and PC), and Virtuous (the Nintendo Switch), with original developer FromSoftware taking on a … I prefer the old version without the weapon matching, but the new version has a password system and works better on PC. Okay, so I don't know about ds remastered but scholar of the first sin makes significant changes to dark souls 2 in terms of how many souls you get, the enemy placement, some extra content. Having finished both versions of ds2 multiple times I'd say your opinion is a pretty rare one. Menus are where the new version is significantly improved. Plus they made the graphics a little bit better. I can't really call one version superior or definitive based on this though. SotFS improves upon every aspect of an incredibly easy and exploitable vanilla ds2. Fidelity is important as well though, original looks considerably better, but if FPS is incimental then we have a problem. The way summons and healing while phantom works also changed. Also, is dark souls remastered like dark souls 2 scholar of the first sin, where bug fixing and additional care (enemy placements, behavior, etc.) New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I understand you get higher frames but asked my friend who owns both versions and he claims that fps isn’t an issue as most would think. Finally finished 3 after months of playing and planning to play the remaining games in the series but seems people really hate the remastered and prefer the original release... Framerate is 30 -> 60. First I will talk about the storyline of those 2 games, then I will talk about the difference or similarities in their gameplay, and lastly, I will compare the visuals and tell you my final thoughts. Oh I won't argue with that; I agree. The main thing is changing the enemy placements so the first time I played it I was thrown off by how new the game felt just because I didn't know where the items and enemies were. Dark Souls: Remastered is due May 25. OP, if you’re looking to get into DS2, get SotFS first and the original another time if it’s on sale. What they should have done is totally redo the enemy animations, AI and hitboxes. This being said, the reason I consider the original version to be "definitive," or at least more true to the dev's intentions, is that the new version greatly increses most enemy pull distance. Unless you already bought the Prepare To Die edition, it's no longer available. However, we are comparing Dark Souls vs. I'm not surprised nobody in this thread has mentioned it. SOTFS is actually worse than the original. The thing is you can't actually buy any edition of Dark Souls except the Remaster. Most of the time it's just a case of "why the hell is this enemy here right now?" The main thing is changing the enemy placements so the first time I played it I was thrown off by how new the game felt just because I didn't know where the items and enemies were. I guess I still prefer the remaster for 60 FPS, but I can't call it the definitive version. Basically just a slight retexture to make it even more A E S T H E T I C. Dark Souls 1 is much better than DS3 btw In fact, I barely ever see it mentioned. The only case where a graphics-enhanced version of a game that otherwise has the exact same content and the added benefit of an active online playerbase isn't the better choice than the original is if you're a PC player who's into playing mods that haven't been/can't be ported for the Remaster, or you're a console player who doesn't care for the online aspects and can grab DS1 cheaper than DSR. Or is scholar of the first sin another bad case of dark souls remastered? prepared to die is strictly better if you don’t care for online play. SOTFS is actually worse than the original. People have mentioned using multiple items, but my favorite improvement is scrolling a page at a time with triggers. improved upon the overall state of the game, not just the obvious graphical enhancements? I’m curious how anyone would think enemy placements in the rest of the game are worse in SotFS. Definitely remaster. Or is scholar of the first sin another bad case of dark souls remastered? How important that is is up to you. OP is trying to compare apples and oranges. And remastered it's a lot easier than the original. What exactly does it improve upon other than it’s debatable “graphical improvements”? A community dedicated to Dark Souls I, game released for PC, PlayStation 3 and 4, Xbox 360/One, and Switch (Remastered). They chamged the enemy placements for the worst in exactly one area- the start of Iron Keep. So I'm not sure what you are getting at. Today I will talk about Dark Souls Remastered and Mortal Shell.I will do a comparison between them and I will let you be the judge of which game is better. Original xbox version had insanely bad frame drops in blighttown, it was genuinely almost unplayable for me personally, Okay, so I don't know about ds remastered but scholar of the first sin makes significant changes to dark souls 2 in terms of how many souls you get, the enemy placement, some extra content. Overall, it just feels really sloppy. Best example is the butchers in the sewer. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Far better particle effects, better lighting, Working multiplayer and password matchmaking, Uglier textures (armors, water, sun rays, item images, weapon buffs, etc. So based on crowbcats video, prepared to die is strictly better if you don’t care for online play? Rare item drop rates are also a little better in remastered. Hi guys! Cookies help us deliver our Services. improved upon the overall state of the game, not just the obvious graphical enhancements? Online play went through some of changes. ), Cranked up color saturation (hurts the atmosphere), Weapon based matchmaking that wasn't thought through.